Barcodes are everywhere—whether you're buying groceries, shipping a package, or simply checking into a flight, they play a huge role in keeping everything organized. But with the rise of newer technologies, the 1D barcode and 2D barcode have become the main options. Both serve the same purpose of storing information, yet there are key differences.
In this article, we will compare 1D vs 2D barcodes across multiple aspects such as data capacity, scanning flexibility, cost, security, error tolerance, environmental adaptability, and more. By the end of this article, you’ll be able to make an informed decision about which barcode suits your needs best.
What is a 1D Barcode?
1D barcodes, or linear barcodes, use parallel lines and spaces to encode data, with varying line widths allowing scanners to interpret the information. Common examples include UPC, EAN, Code 39, and Code 128, which are widely used across sectors like retail, logistics, and healthcare.
These barcodes efficiently store basic data such as product IDs, prices, and inventory numbers, making them ideal for applications that prioritize simplicity, speed, and cost-effectiveness. You’ll find 1D barcodes in many industries, including retail for price scanning, logistics for inventory tracking, and healthcare for product identification.
Pros:
- Cost-effective and easy to implement.
- Fast scanning speed, suitable for high-volume operations.
- Widely recognized and supported globally.
- Simple to print and integrate with existing systems.
Cons:
- Limited data capacity (typically up to a few dozen characters).
- Minimal to no error correction—damaged codes may be unreadable.
- Requires more physical space for larger datasets.
- Generally stores static data, making real-time updates difficult.
What is a 2D Barcode?
2D barcodes store data in a matrix of dots or shapes, enabling them to hold more information than 1D barcodes. Examples include QR codes, DataMatrix, PDF417, and GS1 DataMatrix, with QR codes being widely used in marketing and consumer interactions.
These barcodes can store data like serial numbers, product descriptions, URLs, and coupons, making them ideal for applications in pharmaceutical tracking, logistics, event management, and marketing.
Pros:
- High data capacity—can store thousands of characters, including text, URLs, and images.
- Compact size while holding more information.
- Built-in error correction allows scanning even when partially damaged.
- Can be scanned from any angle, often with smartphones.
- Supports encryption and other security features.
Cons:
- Higher initial setup cost for imaging scanners and software.
- More complex to design and integrate into legacy systems.
- May be unnecessary for simple identification tasks.
2D Barcode vs QR Code
A QR code is a type of 2D barcode—but not all 2D barcodes are QR codes. While QR codes are highly popular for consumer-facing applications, other 2D formats may be better suited for industrial or regulatory use.
Feature |
QR Code |
Other 2D Barcodes |
Data Capacity |
Up to ~3 KB (~4,000 characters) |
Similar capacity; Data Matrix can store ~2 KB |
Size Efficiency |
Compact, but grows quickly with data |
Data Matrix offers higher density for small labels |
Scanning |
Readable by most smartphones and 2D scanners |
Also smartphone-readable (if supported), often optimized for industrial scanners |
Best For |
Marketing, payments, consumer engagement |
Manufacturing traceability, pharmaceuticals, logistics |
Security Features |
Supports encryption, custom design elements, branding |
Supports encryption, GS1 compliance, advanced error correction |
Examples |
URLs on ads, event tickets, restaurant menus |
GS1 DataMatrix on drug packages, PDF417 on boarding passes |
Choose QR codes for public-facing, interactive use cases. Use other 2D formats like Data Matrix or PDF417 when compliance, compact size, or industrial durability is more important.
Barcode Types Overview
The table below lists some of the most widely used 1D and 2D barcode types, along with their key characteristics and common industry applications. This overview will help you quickly identify which symbology might best fit your needs.
Barcode Type |
Category |
Structure |
Data Capacity |
Typical Applications |
UPC-A / UPC-E |
1D |
Linear lines and spaces |
Numeric only (12 digits for UPC-A, 6 for UPC-E) |
Retail product labeling, supermarket checkout |
EAN-13 / EAN-8 |
1D |
Linear lines and spaces |
Numeric only (13 or 8 digits) |
International retail, inventory tracking |
Code 39 / Code 39 Extended |
1D |
Linear lines and spaces |
Alphanumeric (uppercase letters, numbers, some symbols) |
Industrial asset tracking, government, manufacturing |
Code 128 |
1D |
Linear lines and spaces |
Full ASCII (high density) |
Logistics, shipping labels, warehouse management |
ITF-14 (Interleaved 2 of 5) |
1D |
Linear lines and spaces |
Numeric only (14 digits) |
Outer carton labeling, bulk shipment tracking |
QR Code |
2D |
Square matrix of dots |
Up to ~3 KB (alphanumeric, binary, Kanji, etc.) |
Marketing, payments, product info, event ticketing |
Data Matrix |
2D |
Square or rectangular matrix of dots |
Up to ~2 KB (high density) |
Electronics, pharmaceuticals, small parts labeling |
PDF417 |
2D |
Stacked linear rows |
Up to ~1.1 KB |
Boarding passes, ID cards, shipping labels |
GS1 DataMatrix |
2D |
Square matrix of dots |
Up to ~2 KB (GS1 AI data) |
Pharmaceutical compliance, medical devices, food traceability |
How to Choose the Right Barcode Type
-
Data Requirements: If you need to store only numbers, a numeric-only 1D barcode such as UPC-A or EAN-13 will usually be sufficient. If your data set includes larger amounts of information, special characters, or multilingual text, consider using Code 128 (1D) or a 2D barcode like QR Code or Data Matrix.
-
Available Space: When label space is limited, compact symbologies such as UPC-E or Data Matrix are more efficient. 2D barcodes generally allow more data to be stored in a smaller physical area than 1D barcodes.
-
Scanning Environment: In controlled settings such as retail checkout, 1D barcodes with laser scanners are fast and cost-effective. In more dynamic environments like warehouses, 2D barcodes scanned with image-based devices can be read from any angle, improving efficiency.
-
Industry Standards & Compliance: Always verify if your industry mandates a specific barcode type. For example, GS1 DataMatrix is required in pharmaceutical labeling, and ITF-14 is commonly used for outer carton marking in logistics.
-
Future Scalability: If future integration with IoT or AI-driven systems is part of your plan, 2D barcodes provide greater flexibility, allowing for more complex data storage and interaction.
Quick Comparison: Key Differences Between 1D & 2D Barcodes
Below is a quick comparison chart that highlights the key differences between 1D and 2D barcodes across several categories, helping you determine which type best fits your needs.
Category |
Subcategory |
1D Barcodes |
2D Barcodes |
Technical Characteristics |
Data Capacity |
Low – up to 85 characters |
High – up to 3 KB (~4,000 characters) |
Data Types |
Alphanumeric (numbers, letters, some symbols) |
Wide range – text, URLs, binary data, images |
|
Encoding Principle |
Width modulation (varying-width lines) |
Matrix encoding (dots, squares, patterns in both directions) |
|
Character Set |
ASCII (varies by symbology; some numeric only) |
Unicode, binary, multilingual |
|
Error Correction |
Basic checksum; damage can make unreadable |
Built-in error correction (e.g., Reed–Solomon) – up to 30% damage readable |
|
Environmental Adaptability |
Durability |
Best in controlled environments |
Withstands dirt, scratches, harsh conditions (with proper printing/marking) |
Min. Recognizable Size |
Larger (e.g., EAN-13: 25×37 mm) |
Smaller (e.g., Data Matrix: 10×10 mm for small datasets) |
|
Scanning Efficiency |
Speed & Orientation |
Laser scanners – very fast, needs alignment |
Image-based scanners – any angle, reads multiple codes |
Hardware & Equipment |
Scanner Types |
Laser/linear imagers |
Image/camera-based (including smartphones) |
Printer Precision |
≥200 dpi |
≥300 dpi |
|
Mobile Compatibility |
Limited, needs app/hardware |
Native with most smartphones |
|
Applications & Use Cases |
Industry Standards |
UPC/EAN for retail, Code 39 for logistics |
GS1 DataMatrix for pharma, PDF417 for travel |
Dynamic Data |
Static only |
Supports dynamic/real-time updates |
|
Cross-Media |
Paper, labels |
Paper, metal, plastic, screens |
|
Consumer Interaction |
Single-direction data output |
Bidirectional – can link to online content |
|
Economic Factors |
Label Cost |
Low |
Higher initial cost, long-term savings |
Replacement Frequency |
More frequent |
Less frequent due to durability & error correction |
|
Security & Compliance |
Anti-Counterfeiting |
Basic, easy to replicate |
Supports encryption, signatures, watermarks |
Regulatory Compliance |
Standardized globally (UPC/EAN) |
Industry-specific & regional standards (e.g., GS1 DataMatrix) |
|
Future Trends |
IoT Compatibility |
Limited |
High potential for IoT integration |
AI Integration |
Limited |
Strong potential for AI-driven applications |
1D vs 2D vs 3D Barcodes
While most barcode discussions focus on 1D and 2D formats, 3D barcodes are an emerging technology used in specialized industries. Here’s how the three compare:
Feature |
1D Barcodes |
2D Barcodes |
3D Barcodes |
Data Capacity |
Low – up to ~85 characters |
High – up to ~3 KB (~4,000 characters) |
Moderate – varies based on marking depth and technique |
Data Types |
Alphanumeric (varies by symbology) |
Text, URLs, binary data, images |
Alphanumeric or encoded patterns |
Structure |
Linear lines and spaces |
Matrix of dots, squares, or patterns |
Physical engravings, embossing, or surface texture |
Media |
Paper, labels, packaging |
Paper, labels, metal, plastic, screens |
Metal, plastic, glass, industrial parts |
Scanning Method |
Laser or linear imagers |
Image-based scanners or smartphone cameras |
Specialized optical or laser sensors |
Typical Applications |
Retail, inventory, logistics |
Marketing, pharmaceuticals, manufacturing traceability |
Aerospace, automotive, high-security asset tracking |
3D barcodes aren’t meant to replace 1D or 2D barcodes. Instead, they serve niche applications where durability, permanence, and tamper-resistance are critical, such as in aerospace component tracking or anti-counterfeiting.
1D vs. 2D Barcodes: Full Comparison.
We will compare 1D and 2D barcodes across several key areas: data encoding, environmental adaptability, scanning efficiency, hardware compatibility, security, cost-effectiveness, and etc. By the end, you'll know which barcode type fits your business best.
Technical Characteristics

Data Encoding Principle
-
1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes rely on width modulation encoding, where the widths of vertical lines represent data. For example, Code 128 uses varying line widths to encode alphanumeric data. The data is stored in a single, linear format, making it suitable for basic product identification tasks.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes use a more sophisticated matrix reflective encoding system. They encode complex info horizontally and vertically. For example, QR codes use a pattern of dots and squares to store data like URLs, product details, and even images.
Character Set Support
-
1D Barcodes: The character set supported varies depending on the specific 1D barcode symbology. While some, like UPC and EAN, are designed for numeric data, others such as Code 128 and Code 39 Extended can encode a wider range of ASCII characters, including numbers, uppercase and lowercase letters, and symbols.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes support more advanced encoding, such as Unicode and even binary data. This allows them to store complex information like Chinese characters, encrypted data, or even images. For example, PDF417 barcodes can store detailed product specifications, including instructions in multiple languages.
Error Correction Technology
- 1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes like Code 128 include check digits for error detection, while Code 39 uses a checksum. However, they lack advanced error correction to recover data from physical damage.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes come with advanced error correction mechanisms. QR codes use Reed-Solomon error correction. They stay readable with 30% damage, reliable in harsh environments.
Environmental Adaptability

- 1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes work best in controlled environments.They are less durable in harsh environments unless printed on durable materials. Code 128 on weather-resistant labels can withstand moderate wear. For example, a 1D barcode on a warehouse shelf may become unreadable if exposed to harsh conditions over time.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes are more resilient and can withstand tougher environments. They can be printed on materials that can endure high temperatures, oil exposure, and even abrasive surfaces. For example, DPM (Direct Part Marking) codes are often used in industries like automotive manufacturing to mark parts that are exposed to extreme conditions.
Minimum Recognizable Size
-
1D Barcodes: The minimum size of a 1D barcode depends on the data it needs to store. For example, EAN-13 requires a minimum size of 25mm x 37mm to be scannable. The larger the dataset, the larger the barcode size required.
- 2D Barcodes: DataMatrix 2D barcodes store lots of data in a small area. A 10mm x 10mm DataMatrix code can store up to 6 numeric characters, making it ideal for small-item labeling. Larger codes (e.g., 24mm x 24mm) can hold hundreds of characters.
Scanning Efficiency

-
1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes are designed for rapid, single-line scanning, which is efficient for high-volume, single-item processing like retail checkouts.
- 2D Barcodes: While the decoding of a single 2D barcode might take slightly longer than a simple 1D code due to data complexity, 2D imagers can read barcodes from any angle, significantly speeding up scanning in environments where orientation varies. Their higher data capacity can also improve efficiency by consolidating information, potentially reducing the number of scans required per item or process step.
Hardware and Equipment

Scanner Types
-
1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes typically require laser scanners, which need to be aligned precisely with the barcode for successful scanning. This makes them suitable for environments where items are presented in a controlled manner, such as retail checkouts.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes require image-based scanners or camera-based devices that can capture images of the entire barcode matrix. These scanners can read 2D barcodes from any angle, which makes them perfect for environments like warehouses where items are often in various orientations.
1D barcodes typically require laser scanners for fast, precise scans. Tera’s Android Barcode Scanners, such as the P160, provide the flexibility to handle both 1D and 2D barcodes. These devices are ideal for fast-paced environments like retail and logistics, with advanced Qualcomm CPUs ensuring quick and reliable scanning from any angle.
Printer Precision Requirements
-
1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes require a printing resolution of at least 200 dpi. This resolution works for most general uses, like retail or inventory. TSC TTP-244Pro is an example of a 1D barcode printer that meets this requirement.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes require higher resolution printing, typically 300 dpi or above, to ensure clear and readable data. Printers like Honeywell PM43 are designed to print high-resolution 2D barcodes that store extensive information in a small area.
Mobile Compatibility
-
1D Barcodes: Traditionally, 1D barcodes were primarily read by dedicated external scanners. However, many modern smartphones and mobile devices with camera capabilities can also scan 1D barcodes using appropriate applications.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes, especially QR codes, can be scanned directly using smartphone cameras. Both iOS and Android devices have native apps or APIs for scanning 2D barcodes, allowing consumers and businesses to interact seamlessly.
Tera’s Android Barcode Scanners use camera-based technology, allowing them to read 1D and 2D barcodes from any orientation, making them perfect for dynamic environments like warehouses where items are often positioned at various angles.

Industry Applications: 1D vs 2D Barcodes
Industry |
1D Barcode Applications |
2D Barcode Applications |
Retail |
Price tags, product identification, and checkout scanning (e.g., UPC, EAN) |
Customer engagement via QR codes, mobile coupons, loyalty programs, and product information links |
Logistics & Warehousing |
Shipment labels, pallet tracking, and carton identification (e.g., ITF-14, Code 128) |
Consolidated shipment details in QR/Data Matrix, real-time tracking, automated sorting systems |
Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare |
Basic product ID and supply inventory tracking (e.g., Code 39) |
GS1 DataMatrix for drug serialization, patient wristbands, medical device traceability |
Manufacturing |
Part numbering and work-in-progress tracking |
Data Matrix for Direct Part Marking (DPM) on components, storing batch/lot and production data |
Transportation |
Baggage tags, basic ticket barcodes (e.g., Code 128) |
PDF417 boarding passes, QR tickets with dynamic updates and security features |
Marketing & Events |
Basic event ticket barcodes |
QR codes for promotions, event check-in, and interactive digital content |
Key Takeaways
- 1D barcodes are ideal for high-speed, low-cost scanning where basic data is enough—such as retail price tags or simple inventory labels.
- 2D barcodes offer higher data capacity, better durability, and dynamic data capabilities—perfect for industries that require traceability, security, or customer interaction.
Tera’s barcode scanners, such as the Android 13 Barcode Scanner P166, are trusted across industries. For example, in retail, Tera helped increase checkout efficiency by 20%. Whether for inventory tracking or product identification, Tera ensures reliable, accurate scanning in every operation.
Economic Differences Between 1D and 2D Barcodes
Label Cost Comparison
- 1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes are commonly used across industries such as retail, and their unit label cost is typically very low. For example, 1D barcodes like UPC or EAN are highly cost-effective, making them the preferred choice for businesses with high-volume operations. Their affordability and simplicity make them ideal for tasks that involve basic product identification or pricing, where minimal data storage is needed. 1D barcodes excel in environments where speed and volume are the main considerations.
- 2D Barcode: In comparison, 2D barcodes such as QR codes or DataMatrix are more expensive per label. However, they offer a higher data storage capacity, which allows businesses to replace multiple 1D barcodes with a single 2D barcode. This can lead to cost savings over time, particularly in environments like logistics or for high-value products, where the need for complex tracking and additional information (such as serial numbers, manufacturing dates, and batch codes) is more critical. By reducing the number of labels required, 2D barcodes offer long-term operational benefits.
Label Replacement Frequency

-
1D Barcodes: Due to the relatively fragile nature of 1D barcodes (especially in harsh environments or on frequently handled items), they tend to wear out quickly. This can lead to more frequent label replacements, especially in sectors like grocery retail, where product pricing changes frequently. Moreover, as 1D barcodes store limited data, businesses may find themselves needing to replace labels when data changes, adding to operational costs.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes are more durable and resistant to damage, particularly in challenging environments. For example, QR codes or DataMatrix codes are capable of storing dynamic data, allowing businesses to update information without replacing the barcode itself. The advanced error correction of 2D barcodes also reduces the risk of failure, leading to less frequent replacements and overall lower long-term costs.
Security and Regulatory Differences

Anti-Counterfeiting Technologies
-
1D Barcodes: While 1D barcodes are widely used for product tracking, they offer basic security features. Their simple design makes them easy to copy or fake. Without encryption or advanced authentication methods, 1D barcodes are not suitable for high-security applications where product authenticity and anti-counterfeiting are essential. For example, 1D barcodes in luxury goods or pharmaceuticals may be prone to duplication and fraud.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes, such as DataMatrix or QR codes, provide significantly better security. They can store encrypted data and include features like digital signatures and invisible watermarks. For example, the QR code on Maotai (茅台) bottles uses watermark technology to prevent counterfeiting. These security features make 2D barcodes valuable in luxury goods, pharmaceuticals, and electronics for authenticity.
International Regulatory Compliance
-
1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes are globally standardized, with formats like UPC and EAN being widely used in retail and logistics. These standards ensure compatibility across international borders and make it easy to track products globally. However, 1D barcodes are limited in the amount of data they can store, which can affect their use in complex regulatory environments where more detailed product information is required.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes are increasingly standardized for specific applications and industries globally, such as the use of GS1 DataMatrix for pharmaceutical traceability in various regions or PDF417 in travel and identification documents. While industry and country-specific regulations exist, the data capacity and versatility of 2D barcodes facilitate compliance with diverse requirements for detailed and dynamic information.
Tera’s barcode scanners support secure product identification, enhancing tracking in industries that require high levels of security. Whether it’s pharmaceuticals or luxury goods, Tera’s scanners ensure precise and accurate data collection, helping prevent counterfeiting.
Future Trends and Scalability
IoT Compatibility
-
1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes read data one way and aren't linked to new tech like IoT. They are useful for basic tasks like inventory tracking, but they do not offer the interactivity needed for automated systems or smart devices.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes offer far more potential for integration with future technologies, particularly the Internet of Things (IoT). For instance, smart shelves equipped with 2D barcodes can automatically trigger replenishment orders when products are scanned, integrating seamlessly with supply chain management systems. This ability to trigger automated processes and exchange data with IoT systems is a key advantage of 2D barcodes in modern retail and logistics operations.
AI Integration Potential
-
1D Barcodes: 1D barcodes serve as simple data points and are typically used for manual processes or basic inventory management. They do not provide the data complexity needed for AI integration, which limits their ability to be used in advanced applications such as automated quality checks.
- 2D Barcodes: 2D barcodes offer enhanced potential for AI integration. The vast amount of data that 2D barcodes can store can be linked to artificial intelligence (AI) systems for more advanced applications. For example, 2D barcodes can link to external databases or IoT systems, enabling AI-driven applications like predictive maintenance or quality control, where AI analyzes data stored in the barcode to identify defects or inconsistencies in products, such as semiconductor chips or automotive parts. This level of data interaction makes 2D barcodes a vital component of smart manufacturing and AI-driven systems.
Similarities Between 1D and 2D Barcodes
Barcodes, whether 1D or 2D, are essential tools used across various industries for tracking, data storage, and product identification. While there are notable differences between the two types, they share several key characteristics that make them both indispensable in modern operations. Below is a breakdown of the core similarities that define both 1D and 2D barcodes.
Similarity |
Description |
Data Representation |
Graphic codes replace manual input |
Technology Dependence |
Requires scanning devices + decoding system |
Industry Role |
Essential tools for supply chain efficiency |
Standardization |
Governed by international standards (GS1, ISO, etc.) |
Conclusion
In summary, 1D barcodes are simple, cost-effective, and ideal for basic tasks like price scanning and inventory tracking. 2D barcodes store more data, correct errors, and work for complex apps. Choose the right barcode for your business. Contact us for the best solution!
FAQs
What's the key distinction between 1D and 2D barcodes?
1D barcodes store limited data in lines, while 2D barcodes hold complex info horizontally and vertically.
Can a 1D barcode be read by a 2D scanner?
Yes, most 2D scanners can read 1D and 2D barcodes.
What advantages do QR codes offer in retail?
QR codes can store more data, provide easy customer access to online content, and enhance product tracking and promotions in retail environments.
How can you scan and interpret a 1D barcode?
To read a 1D barcode, you need a compatible scanner—usually a laser scanner or a linear imager. Simply align the scanner’s beam with the barcode lines, and the device will decode the pattern into readable data like product IDs or prices.
Do all barcode scanners work with every barcode type?
Not necessarily. 1D scanners read only linear barcodes, while 2D scanners can typically handle both 1D and 2D barcodes. Always check the scanner’s specifications to ensure compatibility with the barcode type you use.
What is an Aztec Code?
Aztec Code is a 2D barcode commonly used in transportation, such as electronic train tickets and boarding passes. It features a distinctive bullseye pattern in the center that helps scanners locate and read it quickly, even in low contrast or poor print quality conditions. Aztec Codes can store a high amount of data in a small space.
What is a PDF417 barcode?
PDF417 is a stacked 2D barcode capable of storing large amounts of text and binary data, such as photos or fingerprints. It is widely used on driver’s licenses, identification cards, boarding passes, and shipping labels. PDF417 supports strong error correction, meaning it can still be read even if partially damaged.